Categories
US

America’s 2020 Budget is $1.4 trillion

America’s 2020 Budget is $1.4 trillion, signed by Trump
America’s 2020 Budget is $1.4 trillion, signed by Trump

 

America’s 2020 Budget is $1.4 trillion

U.S. President Donald Trump has signed two spending bills that fund the federal government through September, averting a government shutdown that was set to take effect Friday.

The spending bills total $1.4 trillion and include a 3.1-percent pay raise for civilian government workers.

With the signing of the $738 billion defense policy bill, Trump authorized the creation of a space force, a 3.1-percent pay increase for military service members and 12 weeks of paid parental leave for federal workers.

The bills were signed after Republican and Democratic lawmakers managed to compromise just days after the Democrat-led House impeached the president.

While Republicans touted the spending package as a victory for the U.S. military, Democrats said they succeeded in securing funding for the pay hike for civilian federal workers, research into gun violence, election security and an increase in funding for climate research.

Trump’s proposed space force, the sixth branch of the U.S. military, was funded in exchange for funding the Democrats’ parental leave proposal, which makes 2 million federal workers eligible for 12 weeks of parental leave for the first time in the U.S. government’s history.

The space force will be the first new branch of the U.S. military in more than 60 years.

General John “Jay” Raymond, commander of U.S. Space Command and Air Force Space Command, called the new military branch “nationally critical,” and said, “America’s leadership in space is resonating globally. … Let there be no mistake. The United States is the best in the world in space today, and today we’re even better.”

Raymond said while there are still many questions about Space Force, including what members of the U.S. Space Force will be called or what their uniforms will look like, “This is really important to our nation.”

“It’s really important that we get this right. A uniform, A [military] patch. A song. It’ gets to the culture of a service. And so we’re not going to be in a rush,” he said.

Stephen Kitay, deputy assistant secretary of Defense for space policy, said, “Space is critical to our way of life as well [to] as our military and we need people to understand that.”

About 16,000 military and civilian personnel will be assigned to space force. That includes 2,500 military operators (military personnel who actively perform space-related duties), another 6,200 enlisted personnel and about 3,400 civilians.

Several current U.S. Air Force bases will eventually be renamed as they host, mainly, Space Force functions. The list includes Peterson Air Force Base, Schriever Air Force Base, Buckley Air Force Base, Patrick Air Force Base and Vandenberg Air Force Base, among others.

It is not known what name change they will undergo to include the Space Force element.

The mission of the new Space Force is in line with the current National Defense Strategy, which sees China and Russia as the top adversaries. And while they don’t have actual forces in space, they have satellites and can use space and space-based assets against the United States. (VoA)

Categories
US

Nigeria Sudan, others added to U.S. Special Watch List, Says Pompeo

Nigeria, Sudan, others added to U.S. Special Watch List (SWL), Says Pompeo
Nigeria, Sudan, others added to U.S. Special Watch List (SWL), Says Pompeo

 

Nigeria, Sudan, others added to U.S. Special Watch List, Says Pompeo

United States Secretary of State, Mike Richard Pompeo has said the US government has added Nigeria to the Special Watch List (SWL) notorious for countries which have engaged in or tolerated “severe violations of religious freedom.”

Cuba, Nicaragua, Nigeria, and Sudan joined the watch list which had Russia and Uzbekistan.

Designation of Nigeria would not be unconnected with the violation of rights of Shi’a members of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN).

 “On December 18, 2019, the Department of State re-designated Burma, China, Eritrea, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan as Countries of Particular Concern under the International Religious Freedom Act of 1998 for having engaged in or tolerated “systematic, ongoing, [and] egregious violations of religious freedom.”

“The Department renewed the placement of Comoros, Russia, and Uzbekistan on a Special Watch List (SWL) for governments that have engaged in or tolerated “severe violations of religious freedom,” and added Cuba, Nicaragua, Nigeria, and Sudan to this list,” Mr Pompeo said.

According to Mr Pompeo, the U.S. also designated al-Nusra Front, al-Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula, al-Qa’ida, al-Shabab, Boko Haram, the Houthis, ISIS, ISIS-Khorasan, and the Taliban as Entities of Particular Concern.

USCIRF report

The 2018 report of the United States Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), which recommended Nigeria’s designation as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC), noted that religious freedom trended negatively in 2018.

“Religious freedom conditions in Nigeria trended negatively in 2018. The Nigerian government at the national and state levels continued to tolerate violence and discrimination on the basis of religion or belief, and suppressed the freedom to manifest religion or belief.”

The report added that “religious sectarian violence increased during the year, with Muslims and Christians attacked based on their religious and ethnic identity”

 “The Nigerian military and government continued to violate the religious freedom and human rights of the Shi’a members of the Islamic Movement in Nigeria (IMN). IMN leader Sheikh Ibrahim Al Zak Zaky remained in detention”.

“However, in 12 Muslim-majority northern Nigerian states, federalism has allowed the adoption of Islamic Shari’ah law in the criminal codes. The Nigerian constitution also establishes the roles of customary law and Shari’ah courts for Islamic personal law, family”.

Categories
US

45th US President, Trump impeached by House in hyper-partisan voting

45th US President, Trump impeached by House in hyper-partisan voting
45th US President, Trump impeached by House in hyper-partisan voting

45th US President, Trump impeached by House in hyper-partisan voting

Donald J Trump, the 45th President of the United States of America has been impeached in the night of Wednesday, December 18th, 2019 by the US House of Representatives. He becomes the third President in the history of the super country to be impeached by the House.

ALSO READ: Trump faces impeachment in House today

Congress voted in partisan style with almost all Democrats voting against Trump while all Republicans voted in his favour in a two-charge impeachment notice: obstruction of the senate investigations and abuse of his presidential powers.

After 10 hours of partisan debate on the merits of the two impeachment charges against President Trump, the House called for votes at about 20:30 local time (01:30 GMT).

The first charge is abuse of power, stemming from Mr Trump’s alleged attempt to pressure Ukraine to announce investigations into his Democratic political rival, Joe Biden.

It passed by 230 votes to 197, almost completely on party lines. Only two Democrats opposed – New Jersey’s Jeff Van Drew, who is set to leave the party, and Michigan’s Collin Peterson.

The second charge is obstruction of Congress, because the president allegedly refused to co-operate with the impeachment inquiry, withholding documentary evidence and barring his key aides from giving evidence.

It passed by 229-198. Democrat Jared Golden of Maine voted for the first charge but opposed this.

No Republicans supported impeachment, although ex-party member Justin Amash, from Michigan, did.

Being impeached places Donald Trump alongside only two other presidents in the nation’s history – Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton.

Trump has tagged the impeachment process a witch-hunt because of hatred and envy. The House’s voting sets a tone for Trump’s trail in the US Senate.

Speaker of the House and mastermind of the impeachment process, Nancy Pelosi has said she could not guarantee that the Republican-controlled Senate could tow the line of the House. Analysts believe Trump won’t be forced out of office after all.

But Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has said the trial would be a top priority in January, and he planned to speak about the impeachment Thursday morning on the Senate floor.

Before the Senate takes up the matter, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi must transmit the articles of impeachment, and shortly after the vote Wednesday night she was non-committal about the timing. She said she wants to see more from Senate leaders about how they plan to conduct the trial before the House chooses who will act as prosecutors.

On a near straight party-line vote, the Democrat-controlled House approved two articles of impeachment against Trump, a Republican, making him only the third U.S. president to be impeached in the country’s 243-year history.

The White House released a statement shortly after the vote, calling it a “sham impeachment” and the culmination of “one of the most shameful political episodes in the history of our Nation.”

The statement added, “The President is confident the Senate will restore regular order, fairness, and due process, all of which were ignored in the House proceedings. He is prepared for the next steps and confident that he will be fully exonerated.”

The House debated the merits of Trump’s impeachment for more than six hours before voting. Democratic lawmakers pointedly advanced the case for Trump’s impeachment. They alternated with Republicans, who said Trump had done nothing wrong in his monthslong push to get Ukraine to investigate one of Trump’s chief 2020 Democratic challengers, former Vice President Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden‘s lucrative work for a Ukrainian natural gas company and a debunked theory that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 election that Trump won to undermine his campaign.

Trump made the appeal for the Biden investigations directly to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in a late July phone call at a time when he was temporarily withholding $391 million in military aid Kyiv wanted to help fight pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine.

Trump eventually released the money in September without Zelenskiy launching the Biden investigations, proof, Republicans said during the House floor debate, that Trump had not engaged in a reciprocal quid pro quo deal, the military aid in exchange for the Biden investigations.

One of the articles of impeachment approved by the House accused Trump of abusing the power of the presidency by soliciting a foreign government, Ukraine, to undertake the investigations to help him run against Biden, who is leading national polls of Democrats in the race for the party’s presidential nomination to oppose Trump next year.

In the 230-197 vote on Article I, all but two Democrats voted for approval, and all Republicans voted against it.

The second impeachment allegation said Trump obstructed Congress by withholding thousands of Ukraine-related documents from House impeachment investigators and then blocking key officials in his administration from testifying during weeks of hearings Democratic-controlled committees conducted into Trump’s actions related to Ukraine.

In the 229-198 vote on Article II, all but three Democrats voted for approval, and all Republicans voted against it.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi strikes the gavel after announcing the passage of the second article of impeachment against President Donald Trump, Dec. 18, 2019, on Capitol Hill in Washington.

Pelosi opened the debate by telling lawmakers that Trump “gave us no choice” but to pursue his impeachment.

“If we do not act,” she said, “we would be derelict in our duty. Today, we are here to defend democracy.”

Republican Congressman Doug Collins, one of Trump’s staunchest supporters, dismissed Pelosi’s assessment of Trump, contending Democrats have wanted to impeach Trump since he was elected three years ago. Now, Collins said, rather than the House impeaching Trump less than a year before he seeks re-election in 2020, it should be “a matter for the voters” to decide his fate.

“The president did nothing wrong,” Collins said.

The two other U.S. presidents who have been impeached were Andrew Johnson in the mid-19th century and Bill Clinton two decades ago. Both were acquitted in the Senate and remained in office.

The impeachment votes were held about the same time Trump began to speak at a campaign rally in the Midwestern state of Michigan, one of the pivotal states he won in the 2016 election.

Trump blasted the impeachment effort, telling supporters Wednesday night, “We did nothing wrong, and we have tremendous support in the Republican Party like we’ve never had before.”

Trump has on countless occasions described his late July call with Zelenskiy as “perfect,” when he asked him to “do us a favor,” to investigate the Bidens and Ukraine’s purported role in the 2016 election. As the impeachment controversy mounted,Trump has subsequently claimed the “us” in his request to Zelenskiy referred not to him personally but to the United States.

Categories
US

Donald Trump faces impeachment vote in House today

Donald Trump faces impeachment vote in House today
Donald Trump faces impeachment vote in House today

 

Donald Trump faces impeachment vote in House today

United States President, Donald Trump is facing impeachment vote in the Democratic Party controlled House today. The outcome of the vote will determine a trail at the Republican Party controlled Senate.

Trump wrote a long letter to the Speaker of the House, Ms Nancy Pelosi and lashed out over his impending impeachment in a letter, accusing her of declaring “open war on American democracy”.

“You have cheapened the importance of the very ugly word, impeachment!” he wrote in the letter, sent on

Trump is facing two impeachment charges: obstruction of Congress, by refusing to co-operate with the impeachment probe, barring staff from testifying, and holding back documentary evidence; and attempting to use his office to pressure Ukraine to investigate his Democratic political rival Joe Biden.

If the House votes as expected on Wednesday along party lines, Mr Trump will become the third president in US history to be impeached. He will then go on trial in the Senate, where Senators from both parties are obliged to act as independent jurors.

The Senate is controlled by the president’s Republican Party. Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell outraged Democrats last week when he said Republican senators would act in “total co-ordination” with the president’s team during the trial and vote against the process.

Chuck Schumer, the Democratic Minority Senate Leader, said: “If articles of impeachment are sent to the Senate, every single senator will take an oath to render ‘impartial justice’. Making sure the Senate conducts a fair and honest trial that allows all the facts to come out is paramount.”

Earlier on Tuesday, Mr Trump’s personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani appeared to confirm that he worked to remove the US ambassador to Ukraine, Marie Yovanovitch, to clear the way for investigations that could be politically useful to Mr Trump.

Mr Giuliani told the New York Times he passed along to Mr Trump “a couple of times” information about how Ms Yovanovitch had got in the way of potential investigations.

“I needed Yovanovitch out of the way,” Mr Giuliani told the New Yorker magazine.

Tuesday.

With little hope of changing the outcome of Wednesday’s vote in the House, Mr Trump used his six-page letter to rail against the process and denounce Ms Pelosi, the Democratic Speaker of the House.

It was a remarkable intervention by the president, who has resisted the impeachment process by preventing key aides from testifying before the House of Representatives.

Mr Trump claimed in his letter he had been “deprived of basic Constitutional Due Process from the beginning of this impeachment scam” and “denied the most fundamental rights afforded by the Constitution, including the right to present evidence”.

“More due process was afforded to those accused in the Salem Witch Trials,” he wrote.

The president was in fact publicly invited by the Democratic chair of the House Judiciary Committee to give evidence in the impeachment process, which would also have allowed his legal team to question witnesses, but he declined.

The Mayor of Salem, Kim Driscoll, tweeted that the president should “Learn some history,” saying the witch trial convictions were made in the absence of evidence, whereas the case against the president involved “ample evidence”.

Ms Pelosi told reporters at the Capitol that she had not read the letter in full but had seen “the essence” of it and thought it was “really sick”.

In a statement announcing Wednesday’s vote on impeachment, she said the House would “exercise one of the most solemn powers granted to us by the constitution”.

“During this very prayerful moment in our nation’s history, we must honour our oath to support and defend our constitution from all enemies, foreign and domestic,” she added.

On Tuesday evening, protests in support of impeachment were held in cities across the US, including New York, Boston and Los Angeles.

Demonstrators carried placards bearing the words “Dump Trump”, and “Protect our Democracy”.

The hashtags #notabovethelaw and #impeachmenteve trended on Twitter.

Categories
Europe US

From US to UK, the Conservatives are Winning

From US to UK, the Conservatives are Winning
From US to UK, the Conservatives are Winning

 

From US to UK, the Conservatives are Winning

With Friday’s win of the conservatives in the United Kingdom, it appears the wave of conservatism has spread from the United States to Britain.

President Donald Trump has congratulated British Prime Minster, Boris Jonson, hinting s new deal between the two super nations.

Trump wrote a heartfelt message addressed to Johnson, saying that Britain and the United States “will now be free to strike a massive new Trade Deal” post-Brexit.

“This deal has the potential to be far bigger and more lucrative than any deal that could be made with the EU,” Trump wrote on Twitter. “Celebrate Boris!”

Johnson vowed to “get Brexit done” during a Conservative Party event following the results of the general election in central London on Friday morning, having made a net gain of 47 seats in Britain’s national election with just two seats left to declare.

In a landslide win, the Conservative Party secured 364 seats in the Houses of Parliament, making Boris Johnson’s party the largest Tory majority since 1987. The Conservatives needed 326 seats total to win.

It served as a crushing defeat for the opposition Labour Party. Its leader, Jeremy Corbyn, announced he was to step down after a “process of reflection,” having secured 203 seats in the election.

“We did it, we pulled it off didn’t we,” Johnson began to a cheering crowd, adding that the Conservatives had “broken the deadlock” and “smashed the roadblock.”

 “A new dawn rises on a new day,” Johnson said in his victory speech addressing the nation, paying tribute to his colleagues who lost votes in the snap general election.

After his sweeping election win, Johnson declared Britain would leave the European Union by Jan. 31, “no ifs, buts, no maybes,” adding that the election result would “put an end to all those miserable threats of a second referendum.”

The Brexit divorce represents Britain’s biggest political and economic gamble since World War II, cutting the world’s fifth largest economy adrift from the vast trading bloc and testing the integrity of the United Kingdom.

Nearly half a century after Britain joined the EU, Johnson faces the challenge of striking new international trade deals, preserving London’s position as a top global financial capital, and keeping the United Kingdom together.

That last goal was looking more challenging as the election results rolled in, with Scotland voting for a nationalist party that wants an independence referendum, and Irish nationalists performing strongly in Northern Ireland.

In a political earthquake in England, the Conservatives won large numbers of seats in the opposition Labour Party’s so-called Red Wall, traditional working class heartlands once hostile to Johnson’s party.

In his speech, the prime minister described Brexit as now the “irrefutable, irresistible, unarguable decision of the British people,” promising those in traditional Labour areas who “lent” their vote to the Conservatives that he would not let them down.

“And in delivering change we must change too” and “recognize the incredible reality that we now speak as a One Nation Conservative Party,” he continued.

“As the nation hands us this historic mandate we must rise to the challenge and to the level of expectations.”

“Parliament must change so we in Parliament are working for you the British people,” Johnson added.

President Donald Trump’s win of the Democratic Party in 2017 was almost least expected. The elite, including the powerful media ran against Trump. But at the end, there emerged a message that the US preferred conservatism to being the choice of the world.

British Prime Minster, Boris Johnson appeared elated speaking in Downing Street of the UK election. He said he would seek to repay the trust placed in him by Labour supporters who had voted Conservative for the first time.

“We are going to unite and level up” – Boris Johnson said

Boris Johnson has said he hopes his party’s “extraordinary” election win will bring “closure” to the Brexit debate and “let the healing begin”.

Speaking in Downing Street, he said he would seek to repay the trust placed in him by Labour supporters who had voted Conservative for the first time.

He said he would not ignore those who opposed Brexit as he builds with Europe a partnership “of sovereign equals”.

The Tories have won a Commons majority of 80, the party’s largest since 1987.

The Conservatives’ victory in the 650th and final contest of the election – the seat of St Ives, in Cornwall – took their total number of MPs up to 365. Labour finished on 203, the SNP 48, Liberal Democrats 11 and the DUP eight.

Sinn Fein has seven MPs, Plaid Cymru four and Northern Ireland’s SDLP has two. The Green Party and NI’s Alliance Party have one each.

The Brexit Party – which triumphed in the summer’s European Parliament elections – failed to win any Westminster seats.

The Conservatives swept aside Labour in its traditional heartlands in the Midlands and the north of England and picked up seats across Wales, while holding off the Lib Dem challenge in many seats in the south of England.

‘Break from wrangling’

Speaking outside No 10, Mr Johnson thanked lifelong Labour supporters who deserted Jeremy Corbyn’s party and turned to the Conservatives, saying he would fulfil his pledge to take the UK out of the EU on 31 January.

“I say thank you for the trust you have placed in us and in me and we will work round the clock to repay your trust and to deliver on your priorities with a Parliament that works for you”.

Mr Johnson, who earlier accepted the Queen’s invitation to form a government, also addressed those who did not vote for the Conservatives and still want to remain in the EU.

“We in this One Nation Conservative government will never ignore your good and positive feelings of warmth and sympathy towards the other nations of Europe,” he said.

When they return to Westminster next week, MPs are due to begin the process of considering legislation paving the way for the UK to leave on 31 January. Talks about a future trade and security relationship will begin almost immediately.

Nevertheless, Mr Johnson said the UK “deserves a break from wrangling, a break from politics and a permanent break from talking about Brexit”. “I urge everyone to find closure and to let the healing begin.”

He said he would use his new-found parliamentary authority to bring the country together and “level up” opportunities, while he said he recognised that the NHS remained the “overwhelming priority” of the British people.

The BBC’s political editor Laura Kuenssberg said the PM’s appeal for unity marked a striking change in tone to when he first became prime minister in July.

Jeremy Corbyn: “There is no such thing as Corbynism”

At 33%, Labour’s share of the vote is down around eight points on the 2017 general election and is lower than that achieved by former leader Neil Kinnock in 1992.

Mr Corbyn has said he will not fight another election as Labour leader and that he expects to stand down “early next year” when a successor has been chosen by the partyBut he insisted he had done all he could, adding that he had received “more personal abuse” from the media during the campaign than any previous prime ministerial candidate.

Senior Labour figures have sought to defend the party’s strategy, arguing that many of its policies were popular but that Brexit had crowded out all other issues for many voters.

Wes Streeting, the newly elected MP for Ilford North, said the party’s “far left” manifesto had jarred with the electorate and blaming Brexit was an attempt to “kneecap” credible centrist candidates such as Keir Starmer and Emily Thornberry.

Meanwhile, Jo Swinson has quit as Liberal Democrat leader after losing her Dunbartonshire East seat to the SNP by 149 votes.

While she admitted her “unapologetic” pro-Remain strategy had not worked, she said she did not regret standing up for her “liberal values” and urged the party to “regroup and refresh” itself in the face of a “nationalist surge” in British politics.

 

Categories
US

US reopens Somalia embassy after nearly 30 years

The US says the embassy symbolises the strengthening of its relationship with Somalia (AFP)
The US says the embassy symbolises the strengthening of its relationship with Somalia (AFP)

 

US reopens Somalia embassy after nearly 30 years

The US has reopened its embassy in Somalia nearly 30 years after it closed it, after civil war broke out in the country.

Long-time leader Siad Barre was removed from office in 1991 by clan militias, who then fought each other for power.

The US says the embassy symbolises the strengthening of its relationship with Somalia

The Horn of Africa nation has since then been riven by clan conflict and violence perpetrated by Islamist militias.

A statement from the US embassy on Wednesday said that reopening of the embassy follows last year’s establishment of a permanent diplomatic presence in the capital, Mogadishu.

It added that:

[It] is another step forward in the resumption of regular US -Somalia relations, symbolising the strengthening of US-Somalia relations and advancement of stability, development, and peace for Somalia, and the region.”

The US ambassador to Somalia Donald Yamamoto said that the opening of the embassy was “significant and historic” and was “another step forward in regularising US diplomatic engagement in Mogadishu since recognising the federal government of Somalia in 2013.”

The US is Somalia’s biggest donor, giving $730m (£590m) worth of aid last year, news agency Reuters reports quoting an official at the US State Department.

The US has also been a key ally in the fight against Islamist militants al-Shabab who want to overthrow the UN-recognised government.

On Monday, al-Shabab militants attacked a military base where US soldiers train Somali commandos.

Military officials said the jihadists were repulsed without breaching the perimeter fence.

No casualties were reported among the Somali military. (BBC)

 

Categories
Latest News US

U.S. imposes additional visa charges on Nigerians

Nigerians will pay additional charges on their visa applications to the United States of America, the U.S. government has announced.
Nigerians will pay additional charges on their visa applications to the United States of America, the U.S. government has announced.

 

U.S. imposes additional visa charges on Nigerians

 

Nigerians will pay additional charges on their visa applications to the United States of America, the U.S. government has announced.

US said that the additional charges are a ‘reciprocity fee’ payable by Nigerians whose visa request has been approved.

The announcement was made in a statement by the U.S. Embassy in Abuja.

The new fee ranges from $80 to $110 (28,8000 to N39,600) depending on the type of visa being applied for.

“The reciprocity fee will be charged in addition to the non-immigrant visa application fee, also known as the MRV fee, which all applicants pay at the time of application,” the embassy said.

The embassy added that the fee was being imposed to reciprocate a similar one by the Nigerian government on Americans seeking to travel to Nigeria.

“U.S. law requires U.S. visa fees and validity periods to be based on the treatment afforded to U.S. citizens by foreign governments, insofar as possible.”

The U.S. is a major destination for thousands of Nigerians who travel annually for various reasons including education, leisure, and work.

Revised Visa Reciprocity for Nigeria

Effective worldwide on 29 August, Nigerian citizens will be required to pay a visa issuance fee, or reciprocity fee, for all approved applications for nonimmigrant visas in B, F, H1B, I, L, and R visa classifications. The reciprocity fee will be charged in addition to the nonimmigrant visa application fee, also known as the MRV fee, which all applicants pay at the time of application. Nigerian citizens whose applications for a nonimmigrant visa are denied will not be charged the new reciprocity fee. Both reciprocity and MRV fees are non-refundable, and their amounts vary based on visa classification.

U.S. law requires U.S. visa fees and validity periods to be based on the treatment afforded to U.S. citizens by foreign governments, insofar as possible. Visa issuance fees are implemented under the principle of reciprocity: when a foreign government imposes additional visa fees on U.S. citizens, the United States will impose reciprocal fees on citizens of that country for similar types of visas. Nationals of a number of countries worldwide are currently required to pay this type of fee after their nonimmigrant visa application is approved.

The total cost for a U.S. citizen to obtain a visa to Nigeria is currently higher than the total cost for a Nigerian to obtain a comparable visa to the United States. The new reciprocity fee for Nigerian citizens is meant to eliminate that cost difference.

Since early 2018, the U.S. government has engaged the Nigerian government to request that the Nigerian government change the fees charged to U.S. citizens for certain visa categories. After eighteen months of review and consultations, the government of Nigeria has not changed its fee structure for U.S. citizen visa applicants, requiring the U.S. Department of State to enact new reciprocity fees in accordance with our visa laws.

The reciprocity fee will be required for all Nigerian citizens worldwide, regardless of where they are applying for a nonimmigrant visa to the United States. The reciprocity fee is required for each visa that is issued, which means both adults and minors whose visa applications are approved will be charged the reciprocity fee. The fee can only be paid at the U.S. Embassy or the U.S. Consulate General. The reciprocity fee cannot be paid at banks or any other location.

The complete reciprocity fee schedule, organized by visa classification, can be found below.

Search:

Class Reciprocity Fee            
B1 110
B2 110
B1/B2 110
F1 110
F2 110
H1B 180
H4 180
I 210
L1 303
L2 303
R1 80
R2 80

Showing 1 to 16 of 16 entries

The reciprocity tables displayed on travel.state.gov will be updated to reflect the changes above.

For full details on the implementation of reciprocity fees for Nigerian visas, please visit our websites:  https://ng.usembassy.gov/visas/nonimmigrant-visas/ and http://www.ustraveldocs.com/ng

 

Categories
US

Slavery: US Marks 400th Anniversary of Arrival of First Africans

Slavery Illustration. Credit/VoA
Slavery Illustration. Credit/VoA

 

Slavery: US Marks 400th Anniversary of Arrival of First Africans

By Chris Simkins

HAMPTON, VIRGINIA – In late August 1619, an English pirate ship named the White Lion sailed into the mouth of the Chesapeake Bay and anchored at Point Comfort. It deposited, according to handwritten records, “20 and odd” Africans seized from a Portuguese slave ship headed to what is now Mexico. 

Those captives from Angola — sold in exchange for food and other supplies — were the first known Africans to set foot in colonial Virginia. Their arrival 400 years ago marked the beginning of slavery in English-speaking America, an institution that persisted for more than two centuries.   

“This is ground zero. This is the beginning of the African imprint on America,” said Calvin Pearson, head of the local history group Project 1619, as he surveyed the former Point Comfort waterfront on a breezy spring day. 

From 1525 to 1866, some 12.5 million captive Africans were put on ships bound for the Americas and Caribbean, according to Emory University’s Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade Database.  Of those, 10.7 million men, women and children survived the treacherous voyages, chained and crowded below decks with little water or food. The great majority were taken to Brazil or the Caribbean but close to 400,000 arrived in what is now the United States. 

“Those first Africans who landed here were destined for a life of servitude,” Pearson said, noting they were sold or traded to wealthy plantation owners in Hampton or sent to a settlement on the James River. “They had to work the crops — the corn fields, the tobacco fields. It was a life they had to endure knowing they would probably never be free.”

Africans had no official status in the American colonies — not as indentured servants nor as slaves — until Massachusetts became the first to legalize slavery in 1641. Virginia made it a hereditary condition, passing a law in 1662 saying any child born to an enslaved black woman faced the prospect of servitude for life.  Eventually, the number of American slaves swelled to almost 4 million. 

The Triangular Trade 

Slavery came to the Americas as part of the Triangular Trade.

Ships from Europe carried manufactured goods such as cloth, guns and metal pans to Africa, selling or exchanging these items for captives picked up at ports along the continent’s western coast. These people would be delivered into bondage in the Caribbean and Americas. Many were forced into backbreaking work growing sugar, rice, cotton and tobacco — raw materials that were shipped back to Europe on the third leg of the triangle.

Though most slaves from the African continent were taken from Ghana and Senegal, more than 5 million who landed in the Western Hemisphere came from Angola. Colonized by the Portuguese, who dominated the slave trade for centuries, Angola accounted for roughly a quarter of the nearly 400,000 Africans sent to the North American mainland. 

While some tribal chiefs sold captives to European slavers, other leaders tried to protect their people. One was Njinga Mbande, queen of the Ndongo and Mataba kingdoms in the 17th century. A warrior and diplomat, she fended off Portuguese and Dutch slavers throughout her 40-year reign. 

“She was the greatest protector of Angolan sovereignty, and it was 40 years of fighting,” historian Isilda Hurst said from a boat cruising the Kwanza River. Njinga, she said, would hide in the river’s floating islands of tall grass, so her adversaries “could never tell where she was. … She always resisted, and she always won.”

A statue of warrior queen Njinga Mbande stands outside Angola’s National Museum of Military History in Luanda. (B. Ayoub/VOA)

But the Portuguese slavers ultimately prevailed. 

The Kwanza, which empties into the Atlantic just south of the capital city of Luanda, was an important trade route. People who lived near its banks got swept up in the slave trade.

“It was by the river where most of the slaves were captured,” with Africans serving as middle men in the sordid deals, Hurst said.   

The captives were taken to port communities, locked in holding areas, or barracoons, until they could be sold and shipped off.

Slavery Fueled Economic Rise, and Painful Scars Remain

Bracing the U.S. economy

Slave labor helped build the American colonies and, after they won independence from the British in 1783, the new nation.

“Slavery was so big and so important to the American economy that it was valued at more than all of America’s (other) industries combined,” said Cassandra Newby Alexander, a historian and dean of Norfolk State University’s College of Liberal Arts. “It really is symptomatic of the importance that people had to preserving and expanding slavery.”

By 1860, just before the Civil War, “the nearly 4 million American slaves were worth some $3.5 billion, making them the largest single financial asset in the entire U.S. economy, worth more than all manufacturing and railroads combined,” the writer Ta-Nehisi Coates quoted historian James McPherson in a 2014 essay in The Atlantic.  

Individual states could determine whether to permit slavery. While those in the South held more slaves to tend labor-intensive crops, many whites in the more industrialized, urban North kept slaves as domestic servants or skilled laborers. And though Northern states abolished slavery — some of them gradually — they still profited from the institution. 

For example, merchants in the tiny northeastern state of Rhode Island paid for ships to bring more than 100,000 captives to the New World, said Keith Stokes of Newport, who lectures on the history of Africans in America.

“Between 1705 and 1805, there are at least 900 documented slave ships that begin their voyage in Rhode Island and eventually go from West Africa through the West Indies and back to Rhode Island,” he said.

James DeWolf, who represented Rhode Island in the U.S. Senate in the 1820s, was among those who made a fortune at slaves’ expense. He invested in slave ships, in banks and insurance firms that did business with slaveholders, and in textile mills that turned cotton into garments, fueling America’s industrial revolution. After Rhode Island outlawed the shipment of slaves to North America in 1787 — and the U.S. Congress followed suit in 1807 — DeWolf’s nephew continued the slave trade illegally.

DeWolf and his extended family “engaged in slave trading on such an epic level,” said great-grandson James DeWolf Perry. He estimates they brought more than 12,000 enslaved Africans to the New World and are “probably responsible for about half a million people (who) are alive today in the Americas.”

Perry and his cousin, filmmaker Katrina Browne, are confronting the family history that shames them. They collaborated on an Emmy-nominated documentary, “Traces of the Trade” (2008), about slavery and its lingering effects. Then they co-founded the Tracing Center, a Boston-area nonprofit promoting awareness of the slave trade and its legacies affecting all Americans.   

“It’s incumbent upon me to speak out about what our family did and to help other people draw the connections to the ways in which their families are connected to slavery,” Perry said. “If we bury the dark parts of a family history, we will start to assume things like that didn’t happen, and that will greatly distort our understanding of how we got here today.”

Roles of religion 

Faith groups were not without sin.

The Episcopal Church, particularly in Rhode Island during the late 1600s and early 1700s, “profited directly … because donations from our members were proceeds of the slave trade,” said Nicholas Knisely, bishop of the Episcopal Diocese of Rhode Island.

Even the clergy enslaved people.

“We had slaves who were owned by the missionary organizations that were creating the Anglican churches here in the United States,” Knisely added. “We have records of slaves who were branded with the letters SPG — Society for the Propagation of the Gospel.”

Unitarian minister William Ellery Channing had an enslaved cook for his household in Newport and praised her industriousness, said Stokes, the Newport historian. Born in 1753 in West Africa, Charity “Duchess” Quamino became known as “the pastry queen of Rhode Island,” using the proceeds from her cake sales to buy freedom for herself and her children.

Quamino had a better outcome than many other African-born slaves. 

While awaiting slave ships in Angola, African captives were forced by their Portuguese handlers to convert to Catholicism. Baptisms, conducted in big groups, stripped the captives of their African identity. Those who were detained in Angola would be given Christian names. Those herded onto ships often would be renamed if and when they reached a distant shore.

Religious conversion helped the Africans “embrace the gospel,” said the Rev. Paulino Koteka, a parish priest in the coastal city of Benguela. But, he acknowledged, “it destroyed their identity and their culture. Many of them suffered because of this evangelization.”

In 1985, Pope John Paul II asked Africans to forgive white Christians for their involvement in the slave trade.

Slavery’s legacy 

 At Angola’s National Museum of Slavery in Luanda, director Vlademiro Fortuna said nearly four centuries of involvement in the slave trade have taken a lasting toll on the country. Today, though Angola has the third-largest economy in sub-Saharan Africa, at least a third of its 30 million people live in poverty.

“This country was harmed in every single aspect. The social fabric was destroyed,” he said, pointing out that Angola wasn’t the only affected place.

“The slave trade destabilized African societies. … It wasn’t possible during the times of slavery and colonization for African societies to reorganize their political and labor systems. … Sometimes, people try to forget this part of the country’s history.”

That’s why the museum exists, he added.  

In the United States, a bill backed by Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives proposes setting up a committee to examine and remedy the “lingering negative effects” of slavery and discrimination.  

At a June 19 hearing, proponents brought up the possibility of reparations or an apology, or both, for slavery and subsequent laws and policies that discriminated against blacks. They say those measures — affecting civil rights, education, housing, finance and more — contribute to ongoing disadvantages, including a racial wealth gap. 

The average black family’s net worth is less than 15% of a white family’s, the Federal Reserve reported in 2017. 

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell opposes compensation.

“I don’t think reparations for something that happened 150 years ago, for whom none of us currently living are responsible, is a good idea,” he said the day before the hearing.

Hampton’s historic perspective 

Slavery in Britain’s American colonies began in Virginia. It was also in Hampton, at the former Port Comfort site, where the system began to unravel. 

In May 1861, a month after the start of the U.S. Civil War pitting 11 slave-dependent Southern states against the North, three Virginia slaves working for the Confederate Army fled to Fort Monroe. The federal stronghold had been built decades earlier near the site where the first Africans landed two centuries earlier.

The slaves sought refuge with Union troops who’d volunteered to suppress what was characterized as the Southern rebellion. Their commander, Maj. Gen. Benjamin Franklin Butler, declared the slaves “contraband of war,” a seemingly dehumanizing decision but one that meant they could legally be allowed to remain and support the Union cause. 

Butler’s decision lent protection to thousands of blacks who escaped to the fort during the four-year war, and, says Project 1619 co-founder Bill Wiggins, laid the groundwork for historic measures. 

Wiggins said the decision “forced” President Abraham Lincoln, in early 1863, to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, which declared “that all persons held as slaves” in Confederate states “are, and henceforward shall be free.”

That “led to the 13th Amendment, ending enslavement, and paved the way for the 14th Amendment, which provided citizenship (for the formerly enslaved) in 1866,” Wiggins said.

The fort was decommissioned as a military installation in September 2011. Two months later, President Barack Obama — son of a black African father and white American mother — designated Fort Monroe as a national monument.

At a small cemetery in Hampton, Brenda Tucker stood among graves where her forebears — including William Tucker, believed to be the first child born to Africans in the American colonies — have been laid to rest. 

Packed into slave ships from Angola, “so many did not survive. But the ones that did survive were the healthy ones, our ancestors,” Tucker said. Looking around the site, she added, “There is no way we can pass it or walk through it without thinking of an ancestor to whom we owe gratitude.”

Chris Simkins reported from Virginia and Rhode Island, with Mayra de Lasalette contributing from Angola and Carol Guensburg from Washington. (VoA)

Categories
Latest News US

US Imposes Travel Ban on Salah Gosh, Sudan’s Former Security Chief

Former Sudan's NISS Chief, Salah Abdalla Mohamed Mohamed Salih, also known as Salah Gosh
Former Sudan’s NISS Chief, Salah Abdalla Mohamed Mohamed Salih, also known as Salah Gosh

US Imposes Travel Ban on Salah Gosh, Sudan’s Former Security Chief

 

The United States Department of State, has announced Visa ban on the former Director-General of Sudan’s National Intelligence and Security Services (NISS), Salah Abdalla Mohamed Mohamed Salih, also known as Salah Gosh for his alleged involvement in gross human rights violations.

US in announcing the ban Wednesday, said it has “credible information” that Salah Abdalla Mohamed Mohamed Salih, also known as Salah Gosh, “was involved in torture during his tenure as head of NISS.” 

Gosh, 63, resigned his position as security chief in April, after the military forced out Sudan’s president, Omar al-Bashir. Gosh had worked with the security force for nearly four decades, according to The National, a Middle East news organization. He faces charges in Sudan of incitement and involvement in the deaths of protesters who pressed for Bashir’s removal after 30 years in power.   

The ban blocks Gosh and his family members from entry to the United States. That includes his wife, Awatif Ahmed Seed Ahmed Mohamed, and his daughter, Shima Salah Abdallah Mohamed.

“We will continue to hold accountable those who violate human rights,” Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said in a tweet. 

Reactions from Sudanese

Sudanese citizens had a mixed reaction to the U.S. move.

“This is a clear message to members of the Transitional Military Council in Sudan that the American government has not forgotten the atrocities committed in June against the peaceful protesters,” Khartoum resident Hiba Fagiri told VOA. “They want to remind them that those atrocities were a violation of human rights.”

Businessman Ali Hassan was skeptical, though, insisting, “We are not going to gain anything from this sanction because even if he has wealth, the Sudanese are not going to gain anything from him. This is a political game from the American government to threaten those who are coming to rule Sudan and they may even come and loot our resources.”

Accountability

Joshua White of The Sentry, a Washington-based investigative and policy group that tracks money connected to African war criminals, told VOA that the visa ban “sends a clear message to members of the former regime that the United States is continuing to hold them accountable for human rights abuses and corruption that occurred under the former regime.”

The Sentry also encourages a freeze on the financial assets of Gosh, his relatives and any collaborators, said White, who directs policy and analysis for the organization.

“We think that is really the gold [standard], in terms of what needs to happen,” White said.

He called for the United States, the European Union and the African Union to impose financial sanctions “to really bring true accountability but also … to ensure that these individuals don’t continue to perpetuate a cycle of violence, don’t continue to steal from state assets.”  (VOA)

Categories
Politics US

Trump Presidency and Core American Values, By Solomon Umazi

President Donald Trump
President Donald Trump

 

Trump Presidency and Core American Values, By Solomon Umazi

 

By November 2020, barely 15 months away, the United States of America (USA) will again go to the polls to elect their president. Incumbent, President Donald Trump of the Republican Party is throwing his hat into the ring for a second term of four years. It will once again be a battle of wits between the already polarised world who either want unchecked liberalism or restoration of the American values. The world will once again test the resolve of Americans to vote for complete restoration of the battered image of the USA, and by extension, global solidification of the Christian faith.

I claim no expertise in the politics of the USA. But we are all students of history. I make bold to say that the so-called American elite will never appreciate people like Trump until Americans, and by extension, the remnant of the dwindling Christian world, lose their well-cherished freedom founded on the truths of the Bible, and their homeland security.

The priceless worth of freedom is often appreciated when it is absent. Ask any Christian from Northern Africa or Turkey. I am not alone in thinking that only God knows in full why Trump became US president in 2016. It is a fact of history that fewer political analyst and experts gave him a chance than they gave his Democrat opponent, Hillary Clinton. Not even his party members thought that Republicans will be in government with a Trump candidacy today.

I do not buy into many of the narratives for or against his presidency, not even the apocalyptic or demonic versions. At least, I have learnt that whenever we think we know better, we do not know beyond those things we choose to know. We are usually too full of our self-styled knowledge that nothing else is allowed in. Sadly, we have often realized our folly late, after it is obvious that we know less than we wanted to showcase.

For instance, Nigerian Noble Laureate, our own dear Prof. Wole Soyinka placed his American Green Card on the line to drive home his supposed superior knowledge or argument on global politics. It turned out that he made a deadly mistake and Nigerians did not forgive him or give him a chance to renege on his bet – he had to destroy his Green Card as he had vowed. 

Recall, that a few years ago, in Nigeria, such disdain held sway over former President Goodluck Jonathan as is on Trump now. He was tagged clueless, weak, and everything unpresidential, even though his undisputable candour and demeanour gave everybody from North to South, East to West, a sense of belonging and security. Then our intelligentsias, the likes of former President Olusegun Obasanjo, Pastor Tunde Bakare, former Rivers State Governor Rotimi Amaechi, Soyinka among publicly derided Jonathan and sat on the streets to protest marginal fuel hike and cross-carpeting.

They mesmerized our sensibility with big grammar at various fora and podia in protest and insistence on a “Jonathan must go agenda.” They offered the most ridiculous and cheap to sell mantra ‘then and now’ that a leopard can “change” his skin. They jointly orchestrated the emergence of President Muhammadu Buhari in 2015. Now, Buhari has longed proven that leopards do not change their skins. 

The clouds are gathering for America. Americans seem to be on the same project of ‘anyone but Trump.’ And I can hear the refrain right here. But I pray history will deny Americans our lot in Nigeria with or without Trump. Take it or leave it, White Supremacy (WS) is real. But the flip-side is something more subtle and disturbing that if allowed to fester, then WS will be ‘moi-moi.’ Humanity is under siege to define its true identity and most logical affiliation – a godless or a godly world!

Today, America represents the strongest voice of a godly world as proclaimed by Christians globally. But to say that American voice has come under very serious attack from within and without is stating the obvious. It can only be part of a seeming secret (so-called illuminati of the sort?) if we cannot detect where former United States President, Barack Obama and Trump each stand on this emerging siege on humanity and the Christian faith. Denying this reality can only be a conscious or unconscious endorsement for the ‘spirit’ of the (New or Old) Age than being truthful as a Christian. 

No gainsaying Obama was (is) well-read, but we may be lacking in spiritual discernment if we cannot detect when devils appear as angels of light to undo or corrupt the works and people of God. We should be knowledgeable enough to decipher when someone is politely and “polishedly” insulting our sensibilities. For instance, for Obama to have maintained as an official government position that “Merry Christmas” is politically incorrect to come from the White House to American people for eight years while Muslims got the full dose of their greetings as a politically correct ‘tolerance package’ from the same WH is one of many refined insults from the likes of Obama.

 This is not trivial as you might think. Why did a US President come that low on such ‘trivial’ matters like “Merry Christmas,” that can never proceed from Saudi or Iranian government houses or Buhari’s Aso Rock?  

Also today, increasing numbers of young girls (teens and under-teens) in North America are confused and protesting why they are addressed as a ‘she’ and not whatever they want. Some of them (at 6 or 16) proudly say they do not know whether they are boys or girls, and you think they are kidding? No thanks to the trumpeting, (nay Obamating) of their human rights to choose between being a boy or anything else except a girl.

Trump has succeeded in repealing the non-gendered washroom law in a public place. These are some of the worldviews that make the likes of Obama a darling when compared to Trump. I know many of us may not subscribe to such indoctrination, but such law-backing policies gave Obama his shine, especially in popular media houses that tolerate everything but the proclamation of Christian faith of USA founding fathers. 

We are all sinners before God and Trump is not an exception as has been readily pointed out, no thanks to his unrepentant gutter language and skewed moral dispositions. But we must be guided by the verdict of our Lord Jesus that only the perfect sinless should cast aspersions (stones) on sinners.

Trump may not like foreigners, but his main targets are obvious to his best critics, and those targets know themselves too well. One thing is clear, the Islamic extremists are for once being confronted by another ‘extremist’ to prove that no one has the monopoly of terror or closure of borders to a segment of humanity. To me, Trump fits this description: Tough Responses to Unchallenged Muslim Presumptions (TRUMP).

                         Reverend Solomon Umazi, The Presbyterian Church of Nigeria, Abuja.

Translate »